emergencyadmin
Posts by :
Open Position: Executive Director
JOB SUMMARY
The Thomasville History Center (THC) in Thomasville, Georgia, is seeking an experienced museum professional who will serve as the Executive Director to oversee this medium-sized organization with a $500,000 annual operating budget and four full-time staff. The Executive Director, in partnership with a responsive and experienced board, will be responsible for all aspects of the institution and will oversee everything from day-to-day operations to comprehensive long-range planning. The ideal candidate will be an innovative, experienced museum professional who is a collaborative leader, an articulate communicator, and a proven development professional. This position will report directly to the Board of Directors.
In existence since 1952, the Thomasville History Center is in Southwest Georgia in the heart of the Red Hills Region, an area known for its rich history, rolling hills, and red clay soils. Thomasville is a thriving, vibrant community of multi-generational families and civic-minded people. The community repeatedly appears on lists of the best places to live, work, and visit. The Thomasville History Center’s four-plus acres of land encompass two campuses, including thirteen historic structures and a collection of over 500,000 items covering the history of the region.
The Thomasville History Center enjoys tremendous community support. The THC maintains extensive regional partnerships that exist to meet its mission to “connect the Red Hills’ past with its present to inspire and enrich current and future generations.”
The Executive Director of the THC will lead the organization through the implementation of a recently completed Strategic Plan through which the THC will play a larger and more prominent role in the community and the Red Hills region. In addition, the organization’s resources hold enormous potential for the future as the THC’s Board, staff, funders, volunteers, and partners will provide the ED with countless ways to move the institution forward.
PRIMARY DUTIES:
Development
The ED is the primary fundraiser and is responsible for all development-related work such as cultivating donor relationships, securing and administering grants, building new financial partnerships, and managing the Fund Development Committee.
Marketing
The ED is responsible for overseeing marketing efforts and promoting THC’s brand and public awareness in the community and the Red Hills region. Community engagement and educational opportunities that attract a broad range of audiences are key to these marketing efforts.
Fiscal Management
The ED is responsible for drafting and managing the annual budget and has primary responsibility for managing all fiscal needs including managing investments, tax reporting, and organizational regulatory responsibilities.
Board Relations
The ED works closely with the THC’s 11-member board to create the vision and set the direction of the THC. The ED chairs the Board Development Committee and manages board communications, meetings, and development.
Strategic Planning
The ED oversees and manages all planning-related needs. This includes working together with the staff and Board to meet and exceed the goals of the current strategic plan as well as updating strategic initiatives in the future.
Human Resources
The ED is responsible for managing and directing the THC’s staff, ensuring professionalism, communication, and teamwork across the organization.
DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS
- A heart to serve, committed to the mission of the THC through service to the organization and the community.
- Senior-level management experience in a fast-paced, small to medium-sized non-profit organization with an M.A. in history, public history, museum studies, or education from an accredited college or university and familiarity with museum professional standards in areas such as collections, interpretation, administration, and education.
- Demonstrated ability to engage a variety of audiences in ways that generate excitement and promote the well-being of the THC
- Track record of successful collaboration with a wide range of stakeholders across the Red Hills Region to generate both earned income and long-standing funding support.
- Cultural sensitivity and diplomacy, emotional intelligence, and commitment to the highest standards of professionalism
- Proven financial management with success in managing budgets and facilities
- Familiarity with social media platforms, email programs, customer management databases, basic accounting, and graphic design
- Applied knowledge of professional museum principles, practices, and procedures and current issues in the field of museum education, including knowledge of research tools and methodology
- Excellent communication (speaking, writing, presentation, and listening) skills and an ability to effectively communicate with all levels of the staff, as well as with external audiences such as vendors and contractors
- Demonstrated organizational planning, problem-solving, and collaboration
- Effective interpersonal skills, judgment, and discretion
- Excellent computer skills with proficiency in Quickbooks, Excel, CRM, and various database platforms such as Square and Past Perfect
WORKING CONDITIONS
- Work is predominately done in an office setting
- Must have the ability to complete certain physical activities.
- The position will require occasional work on weekends and evenings.
- There will be instances where the position will be working in outdoor environments in all types of weather.
- There will be instances where work will take place in crowded, cramped, or small work areas.
- Occasional exposure to cleaning agents or chemicals
Minimum travel will be required, less than 10 percent.
Applicants must submit a cover letter and resume to historycenterresume@gmail.com
Recipes from the Vault – Wild Goose
Every so often, the museum receives a donation that includes a cookbook or recipe card. Sometimes the recipes are familiar comfort foods still served on many Thomas County tables. Others… well, let’s just say some recipes are best left in the past. This series highlights some of those recipes: from the classics to the experimental. If you try any of these recipes, successfully or not, let us know what you think in the comments!
Wild Goose by Mrs. John Cone, 1972
This recipe was recorded in the book Our Favorite Recipes: Sponsored by Thomasville Chapter Daughters of the American Revolution, Thomasville, Georgia. 1972-1973. Gloria Watson Cone (1921-1996) was born in Atlanta as the only child of Archibald Murphy and Ella Staten Watson. Gloria and her mother returned to their family property in Thomasville following the death of her father in 1928. Gloria attended Agnes Scott College and married Dr. John Henry Cone in 1951. The couple had one child, a son named Archibald W. Cone.
Gloria was a member of the Thomasville Chapter Daughters of the American Revolution. In the early 1970s, they assembled this cookbook for a fundraiser for the chapter and dedicated the book to Mrs. James B. Burch who served as Regent of the chapter for several years. The cookbook includes seven sections of recipes gathered from the members from breads and salads to casseroles, brunch menus, and desserts.
Today’s recipe is for wild goose which was as close as I could find for a Thanksgiving turkey in this collection of recipes. Since most of our local grocery stores and butchers don’t carry goose frequently, and going after the Canadian Geese at Cherokee Park won’t win you any points with the police department next door, why not substitute the goose with duck or turkey? Perhaps this recipe will inspire your next family Thanksgiving tradition!
Wild Goose:
½ c. chopped celery
¼ c. red wine
Milk
1 beaten egg
1 tsp. parsley
2/3 c. pine nuts or filberts, opt.
Littled onion (well seasoned)
8 or so slices dry bread
2 tart apples, chopped, moistened with juice of ½ lemon
½ c. seedless raisins
Salt and pepper
Prick skin with sharp fork. Sauté liver, chopped, ½ c. chopped celery and onion. When brown add wine and simmer 10 mins. Take bread, soak in milk (squeeze dry). Add apples, egg, parsley, raisins, nuts. Rub well with salt and pepper inside. Take off neck; sew up. Season outside with salt and pepper. Bake for ½ hr. at 450 deg., uncovered, basting often. Pour off all grease. Add 3 c. dry red wine. Cook at 300 deg. Until tender. Pour off fat, add 2 tbsp. flour, ½ c. water per cup of gravy; put through sieve.
Mrs. John Cone
Dead Men Play No Piano
While doing my tombstone tours of Laurel Hill Cemetery in Thomasville, one of my favorite sites to talk about is the Arnold-Swan Mausoleum. As one of the few crypts of this size in the cemetery, it’s hard to miss. Not only does its mere appearance inspire curiosity, but it also brings up ghost stories from locals! I’ve heard tales from many people – students who cut through the cemetery after school, groundskeepers doing the mowing, curious passersby, and people passing down a story they were told as children – all about hearing piano music coming from the crypt. There is no piano in the crypt. So how did this story get started? Do ghosts even play piano? Let’s investigate this ghostly tale and see if we can trace the story of the mysterious piano music of the Arnold-Swan Mausoleum.
I would like to offer one reminder before we begin: it is illegal to trespass on private property, including locked mausoleums. The dead have legal protections against tampering to avoid grave desecration. While I highly encourage you to visit the local cemeteries and view their solemn beauty, especially the Arnold-Swan Mausoleum, please remember to be respectful and courteous of the sites you visit so we may preserve them out of respect for the dead and as preservation for future generations. With that said, let’s (figuratively) dig into this story! Hang in there – it’s a bit long.
There are three burials in this mausoleum, each one a woman whose life was affected by extraordinary circumstances. Their names are Mary Angeline Fambro (1850-1937), Ella Milton Fambro Arnold (1855-1943), and Maynita Arnold Swan (1879-1910). Mary and Ella were born in North Georgia on the cusp of the Civil War. Their parents died while the girls were still young, and they were sent to live on the family plantation with their wealthy grandfather. On the plantation, the girls learned to play piano and sing, a highly desirable talent for ladies of their social status. After the War, Grandpa lost much of his wealth and land and the girls lost their luxurious lifestyle.
Remember Scarlett O’Hara’s famous line about “As God is my witness, I’ll never go hungry again”? That might as well have been said by Mary. When she was old enough, she did the unthinkable: she became an actress! Like all good actresses, she assumed a stage name. As Miss Nellie Firmin, she tread the boards of the Bella Union Theater in San Francisco. Don’t get the wrong idea though: this was not Broadway and Mary was no Angelina Jolie, despite her formal piano training. This was a theater for men only with the type of shows you don’t write home about. This was not the place where stars were made, but it was a good place to find a rich man who might love to share some of his money with you, and that’s what Mary found.
Her rich man was named Thomas Henry Blythe, and he was almost 30 years her senior. Thomas was an English immigrant who made his fortune in San Francisco playing the real estate game. As Nellie, Mary lived with Thomas from 1873 until 1879. He named two of his mines after her. But the relationship soured. Thomas claimed Mary was a little too money hungry, so much so he feared for his life around her. One story claimed she attempted to stab him at the supper table but was thwarted when he pulled out a pistol. Whatever the case may be, they separated after six years together, and Mary signed an agreement stating she was not owed anything by Thomas or his estate. It was time for her to move on.
And where better to move onto than Australia? While living in Australia she met a new man: a sickly fellow named William Jauncey Cruger, heir to a vast family fortune in New York. Using her acting skills, she played nurse to William and quickly convinced him to put a ring on it. They traveled through Europe on their honeymoon which almost ended with their divorce. According to her new sister-in-law, (who totally wasn’t jealous at all) Mary was known to throw wild parties with all sorts of men and smoking and alcohol and even managed to throw a chandelier out a window. But she straightened up her act when divorce was threatened. Besides, she had something new to think about: her former lover, Thomas Henry Blythe, died unexpectedly with no will and millions of dollars in limbo.
Mary and her new husband went home to New York where she attempted to make her claim on the Blythe fortune, saying she had been Thomas Blythe’s common-law wife and was therefore the sole heir. She might have gotten away with it too, but that pesky paper she signed quitting all claims to him came up in evidence. Plus, her new husband was rather embarrassed to have his name dragged through the newspapers like this and promised her his own fortune was worth much more.
And he was right. He was from the wealthy Cruger family who had owned much of the property that now makes up New York City. They had been there for generations, but William was one of the last of the line. When he died in 1900, Mary inherited a 2-million-dollar fortune along with land all over New York – including a little part that we now call Rockefeller Center. Her home at the Cruger Mansion became the site of the first Metropolitan Museum.
As a wealthy widow, she could spend her money on the people she really loved: her family. She had worked hard for years funding their lives so they could be respectable and comfortable. Under her financial stewardship, Emma had married and had children, including the earlier named Maynita. It seems she was the daughter Mary could never have. Maynita was a gifted piano player who graduated from college with a degree in music and went on to teach piano at women’s colleges across the East Coast.
Unfortunately, the beautiful and gifted Maynita was also sickly. In 1906, she and Emma came to Thomasville in the hopes of improving Maynita’s Tuberculosis-damaged lungs. While her health improved a little, Maynita met John Hamilton Swan, a farmer from Jefferson County, Georgia. They were married in 1908, but the good times didn’t last long. Just shy of their second anniversary, Maynita succumbed to her illness. As the heiress to her aunt’s fortune, the family built a mausoleum for Maynita where local legend says the family installed a piano so visitors could play. Ella and Mary spent the rest of their lives traveling the world and, in Mary’s case, playing piano concerts (mostly for the living).
So how true is this part about the piano? Legally we cannot open the doors to the crypt to check without permission from the family. However, the story is definitely plausible. The crypt itself is large enough that at the time of Maynita’s internment there would have been plenty of room for an upright piano to fit in there. However, following the death and internment of Mary in 1937, any piano or crypt furniture would have been rearranged or removed to make room for a second coffin. That means any stories about a living person playing piano in the crypt, would have taken place between 1910 and 1937. In 1943, Ella died, and her coffin was also interred in the crypt. Unless any of Maynita’s brother’s descendants have visited since that time, the crypt has not been open in 81 years.
Today there is no piano in the crypt. But the story of piano music flowing from the mausoleum persists among the community. It is certainly plausible that at one point passersby were hearing piano music coming from the crypt. But anyone with a first-person memory of that would be in their eighties at the youngest. For the more youthful members of our community who have heard the music, it may be the memory of the story mixed with a strong imagination. Or it just may be…
As I close, I’d like to leave us with a poem written by Mary (who was a bit of a Renaissance Woman, as you may have realized by now). This poem appeared in the Tampa Tribune in 1912, perhaps as a response to Maynita’s short life.
Life
A smile, a tear;
A cry, a fear;
Success, a gain;
A hope, a loss;
Deceit, a cross;
A dream, a wave;
A sigh, a grave;
And what?
Behind the Crown
What does the Thomasville History Center have to do with the Miss Thomasville scholarship competition? More than you might think…
The relationship between the History Center and the pageant goes back many years and on a winding path. Bear with me… It all started when I was a member of the team of directors for the Rose Queen pageant. Yes, I know, I’m still shocked by this bit of my personal and professional history. I can’t lie, this factoid kills during ice-breaker games of 2 truths and a lie…
Back in 2017 or so, I was the Treasurer for the Junior Service League of Thomasville. Around that time the City of Thomasville approached League to assume management of the Rose Queen Pageant. For decades, the Rose Queen and Miss Thomasville were synonymous, and the prevailing thought was that it was a natural fit for Junior Service League — an organization focused on women’s volunteerism and community support — to take over the pageant. For a few years, I served on the managing board of the scholarship pageant and took on the task of “beefing up” the local history and culture questions. As ambassadors to and for our community, it felt important that they truly “know” our community and its history. Thus began the partnership with the History Center.
Our relationship has continued beyond my tenure on the Board, and grown to include Meme, who is now a leader in the Junior Service League. It’s becoming a History Center tradition! Together with pageant representatives, we’ve developed a detailed breakdown of relevant historical context that the contestants use to build their responses. The packet includes an overview of the History Center’s guiding interpretive idea that Thomasville and Thomas County are a part of place, and a place apart. Themes of identity, opportunity, adaptation, ecology, and preservation weave throughout the packet and each contestant uses her own life experience and interpretation to develop unique responses to shared questions. Additional resource materials provided by the Jack Hadley Black History Museum and Pebble Hill Plantation add to the breadth of shared community knowledge and traditions.
At rehearsals, Meme and I coach contestants into “speaking in draft,” and develop responses that reflect them as individuals. Usually, we’re met with fearful, wide-eyed gazes and silence in the first few attempts. Then we show them how it’s done, as members of the pageant team toss us paraphrased versions of each question, and we answer off the top of our heads. Despite working with this information daily, you’d be surprised how often we must take a moment and compose ourselves before rattling off an unpracticed answer. Let’s call this leading by example… Soon we coax bullet point responses out of contestants in one-on-one and group settings. Meme and I remind them to not get bogged down in the facts and instead focus on the big ideas, emotions, and arguments that resonate for them. We start with the basics: who, what, when, where, why, and how, and build from there. Over the course of the week, and many pop quizzes during dress rehearsals and down time during talent practice, the lightbulbs go on and responses flow. It’s gratifying to see the transformation of each contestant as their confidence grows.
Contestants stand out in our memories for a variety of reasons. The draft answer that unexpectedly makes you emotional with the force of their conviction and attention to every word; a former camper that is now all grown up; the shy and uncomfortable contestant who lights up on stage during talent; the list goes on. In recent years, one contestant has held a special place in our hearts. Meme and I first met her as a contestant and soon after, she became a member of our first Apprentice class. For 2 years, Savannah Taylor, the current Miss Thomasville, rolled into our bi-monthly meetings with news of her latest theatrical rehearsal, giggled with friends, and had thoughtful conversations about the role of museums in society.
Meme and I try not to play favorites, but when Savannah returned to the Miss Thomasville competition in 2023 for a second time, we silently, then very loudly, cheered her on as she was crowned. Now, we’re cheering her on as she competes for the title of Miss Georgia. We do not attempt to take credit for her success. That’s all her. But we’re grateful to have been a part of her journey. How far this journey takes her is still a mystery at the time I’m writing this, but wherever it leads, we hope you’ll join us in cheering Savannah, and the rest of the Miss Thomasville contestants on as they take a big step into the spotlight.
With the help of Tom Faircloth, a longtime organizer of the pageant, we reached deep into the alumna network of Miss Thomasvilles to request donations of gowns, crowns, and more for our permanent collection. In response, we now hold gowns worn by the first Rose Queen, the late Doris Gothard Mountjoy, Miss Thomasville 1958 Celia Chesnut Lockerman, Miss Thomasville 1996 Nicole Willers, Miss Thomasville 1974 Seva Day May, Miss Thomasville 1970 Devony DePew Morgan, and more. The reigning Miss Thomasville has also lent us her crowning gown for display alongside her predecessors in some years.
While the ultimate goal of “world peace” may be unattainable from the stage of a small town pageant competition, we at the History Center are firmly behind the crown lending a hand in cultivating strong, well-spoken young women, and we’d say that’s pretty great.
Problems with Peter: The Peter Dekle Letters
Here at the History Center, we like to supply our collections department interns and volunteers with interesting projects that illustrate what life in Thomas County’s past was like for her citizens. We have many letters, records, diaries, and documents that give sneak peeks into the daily lives of people who were more like us than we may realize.
One of our interns, Kayla Reeves (who recently attained her bachelor’s degree in history from Florida State University), was tasked with transcribing a collection of letters from Private Peter Dekle (1836-1863) to his wife Susan Dunbar Dekle (1839-?) of Thomasville. Peter’s letters span from April of 1862 to August of 1863 when he served in the Confederate Army in Company F of the 29th Infantry. For most of his military service, Peter was stationed around Savannah but was later sent to North Carolina and Mississippi before he was wounded at the Battle of Chickamauga. After several months, he succumbed to his injuries; however, the whereabouts of Susan following her husband’s death are currently unknown.
Here’s what Kayla had to say about Peter and his letters to Susan:
“As a drafted soldier, Peter did not generally discuss ideological reasons behind the war in his letters, rarely mentioning secession or even regional animosity. However, Peter’s letters provide valuable insight into the experiences and mentality of an average soldier, demonstrating themes of homesickness, despair, adventure, and adjusting to the general monotony of camp life.”
In this blog series, Kayla explores some of these themes with excerpts from Peter’s letters. Please keep in mind that Peter was writing in the language and attitudes of his time which we now consider to be racist and prejudice.
Conscription (the Draft)
As a drafted soldier, Peter discussed his feelings about conscription in several of his letters. While Peter generally expressed displeasure with being drafted, in his early letters he often emphasized a sense of duty and responsibility. However, as his service continued, he began expressing more negative sentiments about having been drafted.
In his letter from May 16, 1862, Peter expresses the frequency of men trying to dodge the draft and be disqualified from service, stating:
“I expect I never saw as many men have as much excuses in all my life to get out of the Conscript law. They get a certificate but they are mistaken. I am not afraid to bet all I am worth that they are Conscripted in less than a month. I am not render any excus[e]. If I do, it will not do me any good. I will be asshoim [ashamed] to go home and then cared [for] like a negro is to get out of service. It will not pay to do so. I am a going to stay till I cant stand it then get a discharge honerably and when I get that I will be safe” [1980.04.02].
In this passage, Peter asserted his commitment to serving out his time in the Confederate military. However, throughout his letters, he never states any intention to volunteer for military service if not drafted and does not express significant sentiments for or against Southern secession. Notably, this is also one of the few times in his letters that Peter mentions Black people as a group. While obviously expressing negative sentiments toward enslaved populations, Peter does not elaborate on the topic.
One of Peter’s main complaints about the draft is that it has taken him away from his wife and infant child and has prevented him from managing his affairs at home. In one letter from July 16, 1862, Peter was very upset that people had apparently stolen a significant amount of produce from his family farm while he was away. After angrily stating that he cannot believe those at home would allow this injustice, Peter notes,
“I wish Conscript will take the last man in the whole state and they will no [know] how we pore fellows feel when we here [hear] that our property are going to nothing and cant help our selfs. I am one of the most miserable men now living and no way to remedy it” [1980.04.04].
Being so far from home, Peter felt helpless while hearing about the issues his family faced at home. Many of his letters contain directions to his wife about running the farm and dealing with business matters followed by his frustration that he cannot be there to assist with these matters. Like many in an unfair situation, Peter wished to even the playing field with his fellow Southern men who were more fortunate not to be drafted.
Peter’s feelings about the Confederate Government’s policies remain ambiguous throughout his letters home; however, he lamented his conscription throughout the war. Peter’s misery over being forced away from home and his jealousy of those who dodged the draft conflicted with his sense of honor and duty toward a job well done. Despite his frustrations with his situation, Peter remained determined to complete his service in a way he could feel proud of at the end of the day.
But that doesn’t mean he couldn’t gripe about it along the way.
The Search for Reverend LaRoche
Today’s blog post comes from the Rev. C. Wallace Marsh IV, Priest in Charge of St. Thomas Episcopal Church in Thomasville and speaker at our recent lecture collaboration with the congregation at St. Thomas. In this blog post, he describes the events that led to his interest in Rev. LaRoche, the priest of both St. Thomas and Good Shepherd Episcopal Church in Thomasville during the late 1800s.
Rev. Marsh grew up in Tennessee and attended college at Sewanee: The University of the South. He graduated with a BA in English Literature in 2001 but remained at Sewanee for three more years to serve as Lay Chaplain at All Saints’ Chapel. He then attended Yale Divinity School and was ordained in 2007. He has served as Associate Rector for the following churches: St. Paul’s, Albany, GA, St. James’, Marietta, GA, and St. John’s, Tallahassee, FL. Wallace spent the longest season of his ministry serving as Canon for Congregational Life and Canon for Liturgy and Pastoral Care at the Cathedral of St. Philip, Atlanta, GA.
Wallace and his family moved to Thomasville, GA in 2018, when Margaret Ann, his wife, became the VP for Sustainability and Environmental at Flower’s Foods, Inc. When they moved to Thomasville, Wallace taught English Literature, World History and Old Testament at Brookwood School. He also coached Football, Golf, and Tennis and currently serves as the school’s Chaplain.
___________________________________________________
I accompanied my wife to a work conference on Amelia Island a few years ago. It was my Spring Break (as I was teaching U.S. History), and I was ready for the beach and free food.
The speaker at the conference was Karl Rove. I saw Rove step out into the cocktail party and told Margaret Ann (my wife) I was going to get a photo with him. I pushed my way through the line and informed Rove that I was a high school history teacher and would use the photo in my class. He obliged.
After the photo, Rove asked where I was from. I said Thomasville, and he asked if I knew about the election of 1896. I told him I covered McKinley, Hanna, William Jennings Bryan, and the gold standard in my class lectures, but had to move fast because I was more interested in getting to Theodore Roosevelt. Rove looked disappointed in my response.
Rove said McKinley was doing some amazing things in Thomasville. He was reaching out to black voters, trying to heal the country and expand the Republican Party. I told him my textbook didn’t present that information, where could I find it? He informed me he had written a book about McKinley and the election of 1896. I was embarrassed I didn’t know and tried to save face by letting him know I was an Episcopal priest in my second year of teaching U.S. History. I still had a lot to learn.
I ended the conversation by letting him know St. Thomas was built in 1889 and we even had an altar from the Hanna family. I told Rove I would read his book and look into the history of St. Thomas during that era. And that is how it started.
The Rev. C.I. LaRoche came to St. Thomas in 1884 and stayed until 1897, many years after the 1889 construction. Many clergy become exhausted after a building project and leave a few years later. Balfour’s “History of St. Thomas,” mentions LaRoche was also instrumental in the construction of Good Shepherd Episcopal Church (1894) and was their priest for a few years. LaRoche oversaw the construction of two Episcopal Churches in Thomasville!
Wait. What if Rove was correct? LaRoche knew the Chapin / Hanna family because they were leaders at St. Thomas. We also know LaRoche was instrumental in forming Good Shepherd (for the black community) and also serving as their priest. Would there be any way he was talking with Sen. Hanna and Gov. McKinley while they were here in the 1890s?
Unfortunately, I couldn’t find any letters (and am still searching). I called Charles Chapin and asked if he had any letters since his family was involved in both congregations. He did not have any letters, but he emailed a few days later letting me know LaRoche appeared in the Diocese of Washington in 1901, serving on a committee working with Black Churches. I started looking at the dates and noticed LaRoche left in 1897 (a month after McKinley took the oath of office) and he ended up in Washington DC!
At this point, I was convinced LaRoche had conversations with Hanna and McKinley. Yet, it seemed absurd. What are the chances the Rector of St. Thomas (me) could walk down Dawson Street and have conversations with some of the most powerful people in the nation? Not likely. For it to happen, it felt like LaRoche needed a relationship with those in power.
I spent some time looking into LaRoche’s past. He was born in 1851 on a plantation in South Carolina. The Civil War shaped his childhood. I called St. John’s, Johns Island (where LaRoche grew up) and asked the Rector if she knew anything about the family. I shared the information, and she began to laugh. She told me she was related to LaRoche’s wife, and her parents were currently in the mountains with LaRoche’s family. It’s a small world!
The family told me LaRoche was educated at Dr. Porter’s School after the Civil War (1867), and that opened up a new chapter. Dr. Porter has a fascinating story (“Led On” is his autobiography). What he did in South Carolina after the Civil War is pretty amazing. It happened because of a friendship he made with a Union Soldier in 1865. The friendship put Dr. Porter in good graces with Generals Sherman, Howard, and Grant. Do you see where this is going?
Dr. Porter had some powerful friends in Washington D.C. President Andrew Johnson helped him acquire land for black schools, and President Hayes (1879) helped him usher a bill through Congress to expand Porter School. LaRoche was a student when Porter was talking to President Johnson, and LaRoche was a priest (working with Porter) when conversations were happening with President Hayes.
LaRoche was shaped by the ministry and work of Dr. Porter, who did some amazing things for blacks and whites in Charleston after the Civil War. I believe LaRoche took Dr. Porter’s playbook and replicated it everywhere he went, especially in Thomasville.
I believe Dr. Porter’s protege would have been known by the Republican
leaders (former Union Soldiers) who gathered in Thomasville in 1896. Did LaRoche have a political agenda? Yes. It was helping communities and people flourish. It was political, spiritual, and theological. When LaRoche left St. Thomas, the Thomasville newspaper described him as having “endeared himself to all classes of people by his genial ways and blameless walk.”
Image Credits:
- The Rev. C.I. LaRoche
- Karl Rove and Fr. Wallace
- Reverend Dr. Anthony Toomer Porter
The Family Tree of Montrose Dan (1918-19?)
Genealogy – it’s become a trendy topic in light of the many companies that now offer DNA testing to help us find our relatives. But have you considered looking into your dog’s genealogy? Many services offer DNA testing for pets, but a hundred years ago, these tests weren’t an option. This will come as no surprise to anyone involved in animal husbandry, but for us lay animal lovers, the only option then was keeping records, much in the way we keep vital records for humans. Here at the History Center, we have a few of those records from 19th and 20th century Thomas County.
Here’s an example pulled from the Hopkins Collection – the Stud Book of Montrose Dan (1978.010.1202). Montrose Dan (1918-19?) was a Llewellen Setter that belonged to Henry William Hopkins Sr. (1850-1945). With white and black patches and little black ticks all over, Llewellen must have been a very handsome pupper… er, dog. As a registered dog under the FDSB (that’s Field Dog Stud Book – the oldest purebred dog registry in the United States), his genealogy is recorded in some of Hopkins’s notebooks, including lists of his many, many progeny. There are several of these little notebooks in our collections covering various species from prize cows to Beagle pups to chickens – but with a name like Montrose Dan, I had to have a closer look at this one.
The inside of the front cover on this book lays out an impressive family history for little Monty (FDSB No. 50469). His mother (the dam for those of us out of the dog business) was named Kennesaw Baby (FDSB No. 38933). While she seems to have been a fine mother, a note in her files listed her as “badly gun shy,” a terrible fate for a hunting dog. Kennesaw Baby was descended from Lady Mohawk Bell (FDSB No. 30563) and Momoney (FDSB No. 24508). I can only speculate on whether Momoney really brought his owner more money or not. Lady Mohawk was the daughter of Lady Chipewa (FDSB No. 10773), herself a daughter of Prince Rodney, and Sims Glenwood Boy (FDSB No. 17727), son of Mohawk II. Momoney was the son of the less pretentious Una (FDSB No. 24507) and her royal but unregistered beau, Prince Algonquin.
Montrose Dan’s paternal lineage is not quite so royal sounding as his maternal side. His father (or sire) was also named Montrose (FDSB No. 25954), the son of Countess Patsy Whitestone (FDSB No. 16036) and… Mohawk (FDSB No. 24504). If this is the Mohawk who would be the father of Mohawk II (and I’m pretty certain it is) that would make Montrose I the great great uncle of Kennesaw Baby! This is turn makes Montrose Dan his own uncle and nephew. While this might seem scandalous to our modern eyes, we must remember that attitudes were different then – especially for royalty. Going back further on this paternal line, Countess Patsy Whitestone was the daughter of Bessie Perry Gath (FDSB No. 4636) and Count Whitestone (FDSB No. 603) while Mohawk I was the son of Countess Metior (FDSB No. 556) and Tony Boy (FDSB No. 541).
If this seems like a rather confusing family tree (or maybe family wreath), just wait until you hear about his descendants! As a purebred, registered setter, Montrose Dan was in hot demand. Hopkins mentions in his book that prior to 1923, Montrose had been bred to several ladies already. Over 1923, some of these lucky ladies included Gene Elkwood (FDSB No. 51102) and Marie Louise Gladstone (number unknown). Then there was Lasuppera (FDSB No. 63896) whose owner was a James Sturgeon of Oklahoma, an unnamed lady who was stolen before the puppies were born, a lady who littered twice in one year, Blanch C (FDSB No. 60483) and her daughter Lady Stella Bragg (FDSB No. 65500) from Bainbridge, and Ruth Walston (FDSB No. 50762) of Moultrie. There were at least 54 reported puppies born in that year.
After 1923, it seems nature decided there was enough of Montrose Dan in this world. He was bred several more times over the next four years, but few of these chance encounters led to puppies. The last mention of him is in 1927 when he was about nine years old. Let’s hope Montrose Dan spent his golden years in a comfortable retirement on the Hopkins farm.
In looking over these records, I have to wonder – are there any descendants of Montrose Dan still out there? Numbers-wise there more than likely has to be someone out there with a dog who can trace their lineage back to Montrose Dan. It might just be your own furry companion!
The Rev. C.I. Laroche: Faith & Flourishing In Thomasville
Tuesday, September 17 | St. Thomas Episcopal Church
Recipes from the Vault – Brunswick Stew
Every so often, the museum receives a donation that includes a cookbook or recipe card. Sometimes the recipes are familiar comfort foods still served on many Thomas County tables. Others… well, let’s just say some recipes are best left in the past. This series highlights some of those recipes: from the classics to the experimental. If you try any of these recipes, successfully or not, let us know what you think in the comments!
Brunswick Stew by Mrs. Horace Alligood, January 1970
This recipe, like all the greats, was written on a piece of scratch paper by Myla Lee Miller Alligood (1914-2008). Myla Lee was one of six children born to John “Joe” Harris and Ona Mae Davis Miller of Meigs in Thomas County. After Myla Lee finished high school, she worked as a bookkeeper at an auto agency until she met and married Horace Columbus Alligood of Mitchell County, Georgia around 1942. The couple had three children whom they raised in Meigs. In her later years, Myla Lee moved to Atlanta where she lived until her death at the age of 93.
Myla Lee was 55 years old when she wrote down this recipe in the winter of 1970. If you’re considering using this recipe as part of a supper menu, she included pairing suggestions at the end of her instructions. Even after 54 years have passed, Brunswick Stew continues to be a classic recipe in our area.
Brunswick Stew:
1 3 to 4 lb hen (or 2 fryers)
1 qt. corn (whole grain)
1 pt. okra (1 pack)
2 medium onions
3 tbsp. butter
Salt and pepper to taste
1 qt. tomatoes (2 cans)
1 pt. butterbeans
½ tsp. Tabasco sauce
2 tsp. Worcestershire sauce
½ c. tomato catsup
Boil chicken until tender enough to leave bone. Pull meat off and cut into large cakes and return to water in which it was cooked. Add other ingredients and cook very slowly until mixture is thick; serve with rice, green salad and hot rolls.
Mrs. Horace Alligood Jan ‘70
